CARBON CREDIT LANDSCAPE
The carbon credit marketplace comprises various solutions to mitigate carbon dioxide emissions. Historically nature-based carbon solutions (“NCS”) have been the predominant techniques to mitigate carbon. NCS techniques involve improved forestry or agricultural management, afforestation, reforestation, wetlands preservation, among others. Recently, interest in marine-based NCSs have come under consideration (e.g., oyster reef rehabilitation or harvesting kelp). Over time, engineered carbon credit solutions have taken share from NCSs. Examples of engineered solutions include direct air capture (“DAC”), carbon capture & sequestration, enhanced carbon mineralization, or the manufacture of biochar. Credits tied to energy accounted for 56% of 20 million issued credits in August 2023, with forestry at 35%, emissions at 5% and waste & landfills at 4%.[6]
Leading independent carbon crediting programs (so called “voluntary”) include American Carbon Registry, Architecture for REDD+ Transactions, Climate Action Reserve, Global Carbon Council, Gold Standard, Puro.Earth and Verra. These organizations publish, administer and/or steward methodologies or protocols whereby stakeholders create, register and sell carbon credits, offsets, insets and equivalents. The voluntary carbon marketplace caters to private sector buyers and sellers of carbon credits who self-report their stated goals toward reducing carbon footprints, whether abiding by the United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goals or otherwise.
In contrast to independent organizations, there are also regional compliance markets administered by states such as California Air Resources Board, Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative and Western Climate Initiative in North America, as well as federally oriented ones such as the European Union’s Emissions Trading System (“ETS”) or China Certified Emission Reduction. Additionally, Xpansiv, NASDAQ and Intercontinental Exchange increasingly seek to create liquidity and organizational structure to the voluntary marketplaces.
Totality’s Registry is established as an engineered carbon solution (“Totality Greenhouse Gases Abatement Methodology” or the “Methodology”) to abate greenhouse gases (“GHG”, typically arising from methane leaks) through the plugging & abandoning of oil and/or natural gas wells.
The Methodology addresses the measurement of a well’s emissions, an inherently complex undertaking given a well’s individual physical attributes, location and surrounding conditions. Usually, handheld devices, such as gas sniffers, can be utilized to detect the presence of gases and can be configured for combustible gases and/or other gases of interest.
Totality’s Methodology requires a Project Developer to analyze and measure a well’s gas concentrations, such as parts per million or percent volume, as well as its molecular composition and emissions flow rate. Optical gas imaging (“OGI”) cameras[7] are expensive and typically do not provide a concentration or flow rate, though algorithms are being refined to do so. OGI cameras are primarily designed for visualizing leaks from oil and gas infrastructure, limiting their use to detecting the presence or absence of gas. Emissions rates can be measured using high volume samplers, static and dynamic chambers, and combinations of various techniques. Due to the rapidly changing nature of technology and methods for measuring methane leaking from orphaned wells, novel approaches are under review (e.g., optical absorption spectroscopy).
In a study of 568 abandoned wells in the US states of OH, WY, UT, CO, PA, and WV, and Canadian provinces of NB and BC, reported methane emission rates range from 1.8 × 10-3 grams/hour to 48 grams/hour per well depending on the plugging status, well type, and region, with the overall average at 6.0 grams/hour.[8] Studies of Appalachian Basin wells known as “Kang et al. 2016” and “Williams-Small et al. 2016” have been cited at 31 grams/hour and 28.01 grams/hour per well of methane emission factors, respectively.
[6] https://aegis-hedging.com/insights/ Voluntary Carbon Market Update, August 2023.
[7] Inclusive of various technologies being so called stereo, LIDAR, magnetometer, HSI
[8] Williams, J.P., Regehr, A. and Kang, M. 2021, “Methane emissions from abandoned oil and gas wells in Canada and the United States” in Environmental Science & Technology, 55(1):563-570. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c04265
